| Sunrise R-IX School District Comprehensive School Improvement Plan |
|
Comprehensive School Improvement Plan
(CSIP)
2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY................................................................................................. 3
MISSION STATEMENT............................................................................................................. 4
BELIEF STATEMENTS............................................................................................................. 5
MOTTO...................................................................................................................................... 6
INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 7
TEAM MEMBERS..................................................................................................................... 8
PLANNING & DISTRIBUTION.................................................................................................. 9
ANAYSIS OF FACTORS........................................................................................................... 10
DISTRICT STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES......................................................................... 11
DISTRICT SUMMARY OF GOALS & STRATEGIES................................................................. 12
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND ACTION PLANS
Goal/Objective #1................................................................................................ 14
Strategy 1-1.............................................................................................................................. 14
Strategy 1-2.............................................................................................................................. 15
Strategy 1-3.............................................................................................................................. 17
Strategy 1-4.............................................................................................................................. 18
Strategy 1-5.............................................................................................................................. 20
Strategy 1-6.............................................................................................................................. 21
Strategy 1-7.............................................................................................................................. 22
Goal/Objective #2................................................................................................ 23
Strategy 2-1.............................................................................................................................. 23
Strategy 2-2.............................................................................................................................. 24
Strategy 2-3.............................................................................................................................. 25
Strategy 2-4.............................................................................................................................. 26
Strategy 2-5.............................................................................................................................. 27
Goal/Objective #3............................................................................................... 28
Strategy 3-1.............................................................................................................................. 28
Strategy 3-2.............................................................................................................................. 29
APPENDICES
Appendix A: MAP Scores Data......................................................................................................... 30
EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY
We believe the major concern and purpose of education in America is the development of the individual student to the utmost of his abilities in order to perform a responsible role in society. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the school to develop the intellectual, physical, moral, ethical, social, and vocational skills of its students.
MISSION STATEMENT
The Sunrise School District’s purpose is to prepare and inspire all students to become contributing members of our society.
BELIEF STATEMENTS
We believe:
¨ Learning is the lifelong process of reasoning and thinking.
¨ All students need a positive self-concept to learn and succeed at an optimum level.
¨ The effective learning environment is built on a partnership and sense of shared responsibility among home, community, and school and establishes high expectations for all students.
SCHOOL MOTTO
“We Enter to Learn….We Leave to Achieve.”
INTRODUCTION
School improvement is a continuing mission for Sunrise School. Comprehensive planning involving the Board of Education, administration, staff, community and students is the process used to achieve desired results. Planning is on-going with goals, outcomes, and objectives to direct the improvement efforts of the district. The team listed below was organized for the purpose of formulating a Strategic Planning Committee to assist in the development of our Comprehensive School Improvement Plan for Sunrise R-IX School District. The strategic planning committee designed the overall direction that they would like to see our district headed towards, which was the basis for our 2008 Comprehensive School Improvement Plan. The CSIP team then designed objectives, strategies and action steps, and measurable outcomes for the achievement of long-range goals for the district. Implementation of the plan will require change and the cooperation of all involved – Board of Education, school personnel, parents, involved community members, and students. We are committed to this mission.
TEAM MEMBERS
* Clay Whitener, Superintendent * Robert Taylor, State Supervisor
* Stacy Warner, Secretary, BOE, Parent * Terri Klaus, Vice President, BOE
* Cara Kirby, Parent *Jennifer Combs, Teacher, Parent
* Tracy Richmond, Teacher * Donna Portell, Parent
* Debbie Sherrow, Teacher * Kim Queen, Parent
* Stephanie Hauk, Teacher * Christy Portell, Parent
* Sherry Brewen, Teacher, Parent * Sandy Jaco, Teacher
* Terry Henning, Teacher * Tammy Werner, Parent
* Lori England, Principal * Katie Krodinger, Student
* Cindy Chitwood, Teacher * Cheryl Vanover, Parent
*Neal Krodinger, President, BOE, Parent *Amber Henry, Parent
* Hilde Unal, Community Member * Shannon Leftridge, Parent
PLANNING & DISTRIBUTION
CSIP
Along with the school mission statement, the Comprehensive School Improvement Plan (CSIP) drives our school. This is the tool that not only gives us direction, but provides very specific objectives and strategies to achieve our goal.
This CSIP is the result of a recent Missouri School Improvement Review in February. This is an evaluation of our school’s performance based on actual data from tests, student, parent, and teacher surveys, and personal interviews. The district received the preliminary results of this evaluation in June of 2008. We were able to put together our team shortly there after and met during June, July and August of 2008. The team consisted of community members, students, parents, teachers, administrators and board of education members. The teams plan was to address all of the areas of weakness or concern. The team met four times and came up with some overall goals. Our administrators then developed more specific objectives and strategies to achieve these goals. This plan will be presented to the BOE in November for their approval.
The district conducted staff in-service training regarding the purpose and intent of the CSIP. The district formulated the above planning team. The team was responsible for the creation of and contents of the plan document. The planning committee collected feedback from staff, parents, community members and students to incorporate into the comprehensive plan. The team utilized the district’s MSIP results, AYP/APR data, long-range facility and financial needs, Library Media Standards assessment, etc. to help guide the district’s plan. The planning team collaborated with various district committees already in existence to support the school. The CSIP is designed to improve student performance, and guide complex educational program adjustments. The planning team focused on overall academic achievement, reading achievement, career preparation, and educational persistence during the preparation of the plan. The plan ties together short-range and long-range plans and breaks them down into workable step-through document to assist the district in achieving its mission and goals.
After final revision and Board of Education approval, the CSIP document will be distributed to each staff member and discussed at the first staff meeting in December 2008. In addition, the CSIP document will be available on the district’s web page and in the central office for public review.
ANALYSIS OF FACTORS
An analysis of internal and external factors was conducted through various means to assess current status, thus identifying improvement areas. Internal analyses sources included annual program reviews, needs assessments, and local surveys. These sources provided information regarding curriculum, resources, facilities, success of state and federal programs, professional development, attendance rate, dropout rate data, and student performance. External analyses sources include the *MSIP results, state and federal program requirements, demographics, and population changes of the community and state standards. After analyzing these internal and external factors, the CSIP team identified the following goals, objectives, and action steps to address the district’s strengths and weaknesses and meet the goals herein.
DISTRICT STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Strengths:
Dedicated faculty, administrators, and staff
Students
Professional Development
Technology
Active Board of Education
Community/small town atmosphere
Parent volunteers
Weaknesses:
No Early Childhood Program
Not Enough Junior High Electives
Inadequate Facilities (early childhood, junior high)
Attendance
Test scores
Economic base (assessed valuation)
DISTRICT SUMMARY OF GOALS & STRATEGIES
Goal/Objective #1: The Sunrise R-IX School District will meet the student performance criteria on the DESE Annual Performance Report in all areas.
Strategy 1-1: The MAP Index at each grade level for Communication Arts and Mathematics will increase by two points each year over the next five years.
Strategy 1-2: The District will implement the Reading First Program to increase literacy.
Strategy 1-3: The District will continue to revise and implement curriculum in Mathematics, Communication Arts, Science, and Social Studies within the next three years.
Strategy 1-4: The Library/Media Center and Technology Department will review involvement and ensure adequate support of student and teacher instruction.
Strategy 1-5: Provide professional development focused to support teachers in developing appropriate strategies for all students.
Strategy 1-6: The District will provide differentiated instruction and exploration opportunities to meet the needs of individual students K-8.
Strategy 1-7: The District will annually review all special education programs for students ages 3-21.
Strategy 1-8: The District will develop a plan to improve attendance for students K-8, which will involve students, parents, teachers, health/nurse staff members, and administrators.
Strategy 1-9: The District will develop a plan to begin a Early Childhood/Pre-School Program.
Goal/Objective #2: The Sunrise R-IX School District will provide sufficient financial resources to ensure its ability to provide high-quality educational programs.
Strategy 2-1: The District continues to maintain a current set of policies and regulations to guide the day-to-day operations.
Strategy 2-2: The District will provide sufficient funds to maintain adequate educational programs and services.
Strategy 2-3: The District will continue planning for facilities to accommodate educational programs and services.
Strategy 2-4: The District will continue to employ quality staff.
Strategy 2-5: The District will continue to maintain a safe and healthy learning environment.
Goal/Objective #3: The Sunrise R-IX School District will improve the quality and increase the level of community and parental involvement to impact student achievement.
Strategy 3-1: The District will develop a communication plan to focus on the District’s goals and student performance.
Strategy 3-2: The District will expand parent and community training opportunities to better enable parents to assist their
children in achieving at the proficient or advanced levels on the MAP.
Strategy 3-3: The District will expand community/educational/recreational opportunities to the general population.
Goal/Objective #1: The Sunrise R-IX School District will meet the student performance criteria on the DESE Annual Performance Report in all areas.
Strategy 1-1: The MAP Index at each grade level for communication arts and mathematics will increase by two
points each year over the next five years.
Evaluation Tool: The Annual Performance Report will be reviewed on an annual basis.
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent, Principal, Curriculum, & Instruction
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
6.2 |
A. Crystal Reports will be reviewed by disaggregated data (i.e., gender, ethnicity, free/reduced). |
Teachers Administration |
2009 Ongoing |
District |
|
6.2 |
B. Data from local assessments and state assessments will be used in instructional planning. |
Teachers Administration |
2009 ongoing |
District State |
|
6.2 |
C. Local assessments will be revised to assure assessment of Grade Level Expectations. |
Principal Curriculum Committee |
2009 Ongoing |
District State |
|
6.1 |
D. Curriculum guides will be reviewed and revised to assure that there is clear alignment between skills taught and skills tested at each grade level. |
Curriculum Committee Administration |
2009 Ongoing |
District State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 9.1, 9.2 |
F. Students will be given instruction and guided practice on test-taking skills. |
Teachers |
2009 Ongoing |
District |
|
6.1 6.2 |
G. Students will be provided with incentives and recognized for improved performance on MAP tests. |
Teachers Administration
|
2009 Ongoing |
District |
|
1.1 1.2 |
H. Maximize instructional time for all students in the core content areas. |
Administration |
2009 Ongoing |
District |
Goal/Objective #1: The Sunrise R-IX School District will meet the student performance criteria on the DESE Annual Performance Report in all areas.
Strategy 1-2: The District will continue to monitor literacy success and develop a plan to address students in need.
Evaluation Tool: The Annual Performance Report will be reviewed on an annual basis.
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent, Principal, Curriculum, & Instruction
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
6.2 |
A. The Board of Education will review reading performance disaggregated by gender, race, and special needs. |
Administration Board of Education |
2009 Ongoing |
District |
|
6.2.5 9.1, 9.2 |
B. Effective instructional strategies will be researched and evaluated. |
Teachers Administration |
2009 Ongoing |
District |
|
6.2.5 |
C. The Balanced Literacy strategies will continue to be implemented and funded K-3rd grades. |
Teachers Administration Board of Education |
2009 Ongoing |
District |
|
6.2.5 |
D. The Reading First Reading Program will be implemented in grades K-5th. |
Teachers Administration Board of Education |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
6.3.2 6.7.1 |
E. Reading staff will collaborate to assure consistency of reading strategies at all levels. |
Teachers Principal
|
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
6.3.5 9.1, 9.2 |
F. The District will provide extended learning opportunities for students not scoring at the satisfactory level in reading. |
Teachers Counselor |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
H. Establish collaboration between classroom teachers and building reading coaches in reading, writing, implementing, and monitoring individual reading improvement plans. |
Principal Reading Coaches Teachers |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
6.3 |
I. Identify and provide services for students in need of Title I Remedial Reading and Reading Recovery using DRA, Stanford, checklists, and various other assessments as appropriate. |
Reading Coaches Teachers |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
K. Provide after-school tutoring and reading programs. |
Teachers |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
Goal/Objective #1: The Sunrise R-IX School District will meet the student performance criteria on the DESE Annual Performance Report in all areas.
Strategy 1-3: The District will revise and implement curriculum in mathematics, communication arts, science, and social studies within the next three years.
Evaluation Tool:
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent, Principal, Curriculum, & Instruction
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
6.3 6.7 |
A. The District will continue to use the EAT Online curriculum program and provide training on the development of curriculum, aligned with GLEs. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
C. The District will collaborate with surrounding school districts that receive Sunrise R-IX students upon completion of the 8th grade to provide consistency and smooth transitioning. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
Goal/Objective #1: The Sunrise R-IX School District will meet the student performance criteria on the DESE Annual Performance Report in all areas.
Strategy 1-4: Provide professional development focused to support teachers in developing appropriate strategies for all students.
Evaluation Tool:
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent, Principal, Curriculum, & Instruction, Professional Development Committee
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
6.7 |
A. Provide staff development time to develop and revise curriculum, incorporate GLEs, and collaborate to develop common assessments through the following: Grade level meetings Vertical team sessions Study groups Consultants Peer observations/coaching |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
6.7 |
B. Resources of the Regional Professional Development Center, STARR Teachers, DESE, and colleges/universities will be used. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
6.7 |
C. Continue provide professional development support for the current K-5/Reading First Program. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
6.7 |
D. Provide training for the expansion of the current balanced literacy program in grades 4-8. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
6.7 |
E. Develop the capacity of teacher leaders through opportunities to collaborate with colleagues and model effective reading strategies at all grade levels. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
6.7 |
F. Provide training for new teachers and teachers with new assignments. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
6.7 |
G. Provide staff development for administrators on the components of The Reading First Program. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
6.4, 6.7 |
H. Provide technological professional development activities to improve the use of technology as an instructional tool. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
6.7 |
I. Provide support for beginning teachers, administrators, and teacher advancement. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
6.7 |
J. Data from student assessments will be utilized by the Professional Development Committee in planning the year’s activities. |
Administration PDC |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
6.7 |
K. The PDC will review requests to evaluate the relationship between student performance and District goals. |
Administration PDC |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
6.7 |
L. The PDC will present a Professional Development Plan to the Board of Education for approval in relation to the District goals. |
Administration PDC |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal/Objective #1: The Sunrise R-IX School District will meet the student performance criteria on the DESE Annual Performance Report in all areas.
Strategy 1-5: The District will provide differentiated instruction and expansion opportunities to meet the needs of individual students K-8.
Evaluation Tool:
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent, Principal, Curriculum, & Instruction
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
7.2 |
A. Improve the District-wide database to assist the principal and teachers in collecting and analyzing student achievement information for current students. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
7.2 |
B. Provide opportunities for teachers to explore how children learn and employ methods and strategies to meet the learning needs of each student. |
Administration
|
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
7.2 |
C. The Gifted program curriculum will be continually revised to meet the individual needs of all students eligible to participate in the program. |
Gifted Teacher |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
7.2 |
D. After-school enrichment activities will be held, such as: book clubs, math fun night, computer club, art club, reading fun night, science mania, spelling bee, geography bee, science fair, etc. |
Teachers Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
Career Ladder District |
|
7.2 |
F. After-school tutoring will be provided to meet requirements of Senate Bill 319 (4th grade students) and other students in need. |
Teachers Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
Career Ladder District |
|
7.2 |
G. The District will offer summer school as another means of extending learning opportunities, as funding is available. |
Teachers Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
Goal/Objective #1: The Sunrise R-IX School District will meet the student performance criteria on the DESE Annual Performance Report in all areas.
Strategy 1-6: The District will annually review all special education programs for students ages 3-21.
Evaluation Tool:
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent, Principal, Director of Special Education
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
7.1 |
A. Implement the components of IDEA by complying with State and Federal guidelines. |
Director Special Ed. Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State Federal |
|
7.1 |
B. Provide a comprehensive system of professional development for teachers and paraprofessionals who work with students with disabilities. |
Director Special Ed. Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State Federal |
|
7.1 |
C. Provide adequate professional development for special education teachers to incorporate GLEs into daily lessons. |
Director Special Ed. Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State Federal |
Goal/Objective #1: The Sunrise R-IX School District will meet the student performance criteria on the DESE Annual Performance Report in all areas.
Strategy 1-7: The District will increase daily attendance rates for students K-8.
Evaluation Tool:
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent, Principal
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
9.6 |
A. Analyze attendance data generated by SIS. |
Principal |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
9.6 |
B. A committee will be formed consisting of administrators, staff, parents, and students to plan increased daily attendance rates. |
Principal |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
9.6 |
C. Notify parents of attendance policies and educate them on the importance of consistent attendance. |
Principal |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
Goal/Objective #2: The Sunrise R-IX School District will provide sufficient financial resources to ensure its ability to provide high-quality educational programs.
Strategy 2-1: The District continues to maintain a current set of policies and regulations to guide the day-to-day operations.
Evaluation Tool:
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
8.3 |
A. District policies will be regularly reviewed and amended as needed. |
Administration BOE |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
8.3 |
B. District procedures will be regularly reviewed and amended as needed. |
Administration BOE |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
8.3 |
C. Policies and regulations required for State and Federal funding will continue to be reviewed and updated. |
Administration BOE |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
Goal/Objective #2: The Sunrise R-IX School District will provide sufficient financial resources to ensure its ability to provide high-quality educational programs.
Strategy 2-2: The District will provide sufficient funds to maintain adequate educational programs and services.
Evaluation Tool:
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
8.3 |
A. Evaluate the existing condition of the District as related to the Program and Services Evaluation. |
Administration Directors |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
8.3 |
B. The fiscal condition of the District will be reviewed regularly by the Board of Education. |
Superintendent BOE |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
8.3 |
C. The Board of Education and Superintendent will study the fiscal needs of the District. |
Superintendent BOE |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
8.3 |
D. Estimated revenues and projected expenditures will be displayed annually through the District’s budget. |
Superintendent BOE |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
8.3 |
E. Staff members will provide input in the budget preparation process through CTA and/or committee meetings. |
Teachers Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
8.3 |
F. Grants will be pursued to provide maximum relief in all applicable areas. |
Superintendent |
2009 Ongoing |
Grant District |
Goal/Objective #2: The Sunrise R-IX School District will provide sufficient financial resources to ensure its ability to provide high-quality educational programs.
Strategy 2-3: The District will continue planning for facilities to accommodate educational programs and services.
Evaluation Tool:
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
7.4 |
A. Study the feasibility and options of increasing space for early childhood programs. |
Superintendent Director of Special Ed. |
2009 Ongoing |
District |
|
2.1 |
B. Class size in all classrooms will be at the desirable state standards. |
Administration BOE |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
Goal/Objective #2: The Sunrise R-IX School District will provide sufficient financial resources to ensure its ability to provide high-quality educational programs.
Strategy 2-4: The District will continue to employ quality staff.
Evaluation Tool:
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
|
A. Maintain a salary schedule that attracts high quality teachers. |
Superintendent BOE |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
|
B. Continue to train administrators on methods for utilizing teacher evaluation tools. |
Superintendent BOE |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
3.1, 3.2 4.1 – 4.3 |
C. All teachers will have the proper certification to teach in the position in which they are hired. |
Administration BOE |
2009 Ongoing |
District |
Goal/Objective #2: The Sunrise R-IX School District will provide sufficient financial resources to ensure its ability to provide high-quality educational programs.
Strategy 2-5: The District will continue to maintain a safe and healthy learning environment.
Evaluation Tool:
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent, Principal, District Safety Coordinator
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
8.10 |
A. The District will organize a district-wide Crisis Committee. |
Safety Coordinator Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
8.10 |
B. The District Crisis Plan will be annually reviewed and amended as needed. |
Safety Coordinator Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
8.10 |
C. Staff members will be trained each year on the implementation of the Crisis Plan. |
Safety Coordinator Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
8.10 |
D. Emergency procedures and drills will be conducted regularly. |
Safety Coordinator Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
8.10 |
E. The District’s Safety Coordinator will be trained and certified each year. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District State |
|
8.11 8.11 |
F. The District will provide a health services program developed and reviewed under the direction of a registered professional nurse. |
Superintendent |
2008 Ongoing |
District Grant |
|
8.12 |
G. A Health & Wellness Committee will be formed and the committee will work to develop a District Plan to improve food services and physical activity opportunities. |
School Nurse |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
8.11 |
H. Facilities will be maintained for an optimal healthy environment. |
Superintendent
|
2008 Ongoing |
District |
Goal/Objective #3: The Sunrise R-IX School District will improve the quality and increase the level of community and parental involvement.
Strategy 3-1: The District will develop a communication plan to focus on the District’s goals.
Evaluation Tool:
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
7.5 |
A. Parents and community will be informed of the importance of the MAP tests and achievement gaps. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
8.1 |
B. A parent/patron advisory committee will be implemented to develop ideas for student achievement. |
Principal
|
2008
|
District |
|
8.1 |
C. Conduct a survey to gather information regarding beliefs and barriers related to parent participation, district successes, and district needs. Results will be used for future planning and improvement. |
Superintendent Principal
|
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
8.1 |
D. Design a method of orienting new students and new parents to the district. |
Principal Teachers |
2008 |
District |
|
8.1 |
E. Continue to encourage and promote the utilization of parent/community volunteers at all levels. |
Principal Teachers |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
8.2 |
F. Continue CSIP Committee plan review meetings. |
Superintendent
|
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
7.5 |
G. Schedule community meetings to discuss MAP events, successes, concerns, and important news. |
Superintendent BOE |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
Goal/Objective #3: The Sunrise R-IX School District will improve the quality and increase the level of community and parental involvement.
Strategy 3-2: The District will expand parent and community training opportunities.
Evaluation Tool:
Evaluation Responsibility: Superintendent
|
MSIP Standard/ Indicator
|
Action Plan
|
Person Responsible
|
Time Frame - P & Date Completed |
Funding Source |
|
7.5 |
A. Provide parent involvement activities to address on-going needs to assist students in becoming proficient readers. (Reading Fun Nights, Book Clubs, Scholastic Book Sales, Six Flags Readers, Pizza Hut Readers) |
Principal Teachers |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
|
B. Maintain a website that is up-to-date and high quality. |
Technology Coordinator Teachers |
2008 Ongoing |
District State Federal |
|
6.9, 8.1 |
C. Utilize a variety of methods to communicate to parents and community members of events, program options, and resources within the district. |
Administration Counselor Teachers |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
7.5 |
D. Offer community learning experiences in the evenings for increased adult literacy. |
Administration |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
7.5 |
E. Increase parent conferences to two per year. One conference will be held at 1st quarter report card distribution and another will be held at 3rd quarter mid-term report distribution. |
All Staff |
2008 Ongoing |
District |
|
6.9 |
F. Develop support activities for parents of children who are not succeeding in school for various reasons including attendance, achievement, etc. |
Administration Counselor |
2006 Ongoing |
District |
|
7.5 |
G. Develop a plan to increase Parents As Teachers awareness and involvement. |
Administration Teachers |
2006 |
District State |
APPENDIX A: MAP Data
|
Missouri
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Overall Status |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
|
|
Communication Arts Status |
|
Not Met |
Met |
Met |
Met |
Not Met |
Not Met |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mathematics Status |
|
Met |
Met |
Met |
Met |
Met |
Not Met |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attendance Rate |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Met |
Met |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graduation Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMUNICATION ARTS |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
|
|
Annual Proficiency Target |
18.4 |
19.4 |
20.4 |
26.6 |
34.7 |
42.9 |
51.0 |
59.2 |
67.4 |
75.5 |
83.7 |
91.8 |
100.0 |
|
|
School Total (All Kids) |
PROF |
25 * |
27 * |
24.4 * |
22.4 * |
41.7 * |
44.9 * |
43.8 * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
2.6 |
7.4 |
3.5 |
1.7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asian/Pacific Isl. |
PROF |
|
|
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
|
|
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Black |
PROF |
0 |
0 |
0 |
. |
33.3 |
40 |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispanic |
PROF |
. |
. |
. |
. |
50 |
100 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
. |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Indian |
PROF |
0 |
. |
0 |
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
0 |
. |
0 |
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White |
PROF |
25.4 * |
26.7 * |
23.4 * |
22.4 * |
41.7 * |
44.4 * |
42.4 * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
1.4 |
4.8 |
3.8 |
1.7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Non-Response |
PROF |
50 |
100 |
100 |
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
33.3 |
66.7 |
0 |
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F/R Lunch |
PROF |
. |
80 |
. |
17.4 |
30.8 * |
31.3 * |
32.5 * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
. |
0 |
. |
4.2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEP |
PROF |
0 |
0 |
11.1 |
0 |
17.2 |
16.1 |
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
25 |
9.1 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEP |
PROF |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MATHEMATICS |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
|
|
Annual Proficiency Target |
8.3 |
9.3 |
10.3 |
17.5 |
26.6 |
35.8 |
45.0 |
54.1 |
63.3 |
72.5 |
81.7 |
90.8 |
100.0 |
|
|
School Total (All Kids) |
PROF |
14.7 * |
17.1 * |
13.8 * |
26.2 * |
33.8 * |
39.7 * |
36.5 * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
0 |
1.4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asian/Pacific Isl. |
PROF |
|
|
. |
0 |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
|
|
. |
0 |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Black |
PROF |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33.3 |
66.7 |
40 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispanic |
PROF |
0 |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
50 |
33.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
0 |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Indian |
PROF |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White |
PROF |
15.6 * |
19 * |
14.3 * |
26.9 * |
33.7 * |
39.6 * |
36.4 * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Non-Response |
PROF |
. |
0 |
. |
0 |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
. |
14.3 |
. |
0 |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F/R Lunch |
PROF |
. |
. |
. |
31.8 |
26.4 * |
29.3 * |
28.9 * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEP |
PROF |
0 |
0 |
8.3 |
20 |
13.8 |
9.7 |
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEP |
PROF |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROWTH + PROF PCT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LND/PR |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL INDICATOR--ATTENDANCE RATE |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
|
|
School Total (All Kids) |
|
|
|
|
93.7 * |
93.8 * |
94.1 * |
95.2 * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL INDICATOR--GRADUATION RATE |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
|
|
School Total (All Graduates) |
|
|
|
|
0 * |
0 * |
0 * |
0 * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Notes: School level calculations do not include students that have been in the building less than a full academic year. District level calculations do not include students that have been in the district less than a full academic year. To meet AYP all subgroups that met the minimum cell size requirements must meet the Annual Proficiency Target, have tested at least 95% of the students and met the additional indicator requirement. Additional Indicator -- For both school and district reporting attendance is used at the elementary and middle levels, at the high school level graduation rate is used. (Note: District level reporting is determined by the highest grade level. K-8 uses attendance rate. K-12 uses graduation rate and K-8 attendance rate.) The requirement for MET is: Attendance Rate is equal to or greater than 93% Or shows any improvement from previous year. Graduation Rate is equal to or greater than 85% Or shows any improvement from previous year. Additional Indicator Symbols: Y For Attendance Rate indicates that the group met the requirement based on improvement. MY For Graduation Rate indicates that the group met the requirement based on improvement. MYY For Graduation Rate indicates that the group met the requirement based on improvement using the group of total, indicating that the cell size was too small for that group. NMY For Graduation Rate indicates that the group was not met, indicating that the cell size was too small for that group and the group of TOTAL was used in the determination. Definitions: PROF: The percent of students who are Proficient or Advanced. LND: Level Not Determined - The percent of students who did not receive a MAP score. A Student will be considered LND if the student was absent, caught cheating or did not have a valid attempt on the test. The percent of students that were LND should be 5.0 percent or below. GROWTH + PROF PCT: Is the percent of students who are Proficient or Advanced plus the percent of students who are on track using the growth calculation. NOTE: For 2007 LND changed to include only those students who were absent all required sessions of the test. Symbols: * Indicates the subgroup meets the minimum cell size requirements. Minimum cell size requirements: 30 for all subgroups except IEP and LEP, which have a minimum cell size of 50 for 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007. ^ If there are fewer than 30 students in the school total, and State Proficiency Target was not met, the current year and two prior years are aggregated. This only applies to the calculation for the school total, not the disaggregated groups. @ The group Met the 95% participation using an average of current and prior year, or current year and prior two years. AYP MET Symbols: Y Annual Proficiency Target Met CI Annual Proficiency Target Met with confidence interval G Annual Proficiency Target Met using Growth S Annual Proficiency Target Met using Safe Harbor provision SC Annual Proficiency Target Met using the confidence interval for Safe Harbor AYP NOT MET Symbols: N* Annual Proficiency Target Met, but did not have a participation rate of at least 95% NC Annual Proficiency Target Met with the confidence interval, but did not have a participation rate of at least 95% NP Annual Proficiency Target Not Met NN Annual Proficiency Target Not Met and participation rate was less than 95% September 12, 2008 |
||||||||||||||